السلام أم الصراع؟ بين تكلفة الحرب وعائد التنمية ! !Peace and conflict? Between the cost of war and the return on development
First – Unanswered
Questions:
1. Does the destruction make
the world desperately need a genuine peace system?
2. If peace is better for
everyone, why do wars and conflicts persist?
3. How can countries redirect
their resources from crisis and conflict management to human development and
sustainable development?
4. Is the problem simply that
the cost of war decisions is often paid more by ordinary citizens than by
decision-makers?
5. Compare the cost of war
with the returns on development, and what nations lose through conflict with
what they can gain through peace.
6. Why are billions of dollars
spent on conflicts when people need development, education, healthcare, and job
opportunities?
Second
– Reasons Why Diplomacy Doesn't Always Succeed Between States:
The
truth is that most leaders don't declare wars because they love war for its own
sake, but rather because they believe, rightly or wrongly, that it serves
political, economic, security, or ideological interests.
1. Ideology and
Nationalism – Intellectual, religious, or national differences can escalate
into conflicts if exploited politically.
2. Conflicting Interests
– States seek to protect their interests, influence, and resources. Sometimes,
two states perceive their interests as directly contradictory.
3. Fear and Mistrust – A
state may fear becoming weaker if it doesn't arm itself or intervene. This
mutual fear can lead to arms races or conflicts.
4.
The Nature of Human Power – Some leaders are characterized by wisdom and
foresight. Others may be influenced by personal ambition, a desire for
influence, or flawed internal calculations.
5. The Struggle for Resources and Wealth – Throughout history, land, natural resources, and trade have been major causes of conflict. In some cases, weaker states have been subjected to economic or political exploitation by stronger ones.
• ثالثاً ــ عشوائية وصول أفراد غير مؤهلين لقيادة دول وراء مشكلات كثيرة وحروب:
عشوائية وصول أفراد غير مؤهلين لقيادة دول وراء مشكلات كثيرة وحروب من أجل ذلك الأفضل أن يكون رئيس الدولة أو الملك خاضع لشروط ما متوافق عليها من قبل الشعب والخاصة قبل تولي السلطة من أجل العمل على التالي:
1. حسم الخلافات بالطرق الدبلوماسية قبل الحرب.
2. التنمية المستدامة والعمل من أجل مصالح الوطن العليا.
3. تعزيز التعليم، والعدالة، والتنمية الاقتصادية، والتعاون بين الشعوب.
• الحاكم المعتدل:
1. يعلم أن ظلم الناس هو البداية الحقيقية لخراب العمران والبلاد.
2. يعلم أنه في حاجة هو وأسرته للاستمتاع الحقيقي بالحياة بلا قيود وحراسة.
3. يعلم أن السلطة جزء من أخلاقيات الحكم والدين ولا فرق بين الدين والسلطة.
4. يعلم أن المقولة التي تقول إن الناس لا يصلحهم إلا السيف خطأ إنما يصلحهم العدل.
5. يعلم بأن الحياة البشرية قصيرة مهما طالت وأن قيمة الإنسان وكرامته أهم من الصراع على السلطة والثروة.
6. يعلم أن السلطة والسياسة أمانة يحملها لفترة ثم يستلمها غيرها بخيرها وشرها وهو محاسب عليها في التاريخ قبل يوم القيامة.
• هل تعلم أمريكا والاتحاد الاوروبي وغيرهما أنهم جزء كبير من مشاكل العالم؟
1. التدخل الأمريكي والاوروبي في الصراعات الدولية مثل الحروب والصراعات والفقر والتغير المناخي، هي التي تدفع الناس إلى مغادرة بلدانهم وكثرة الحروب النزاعات.
2. التدخل الأمريكي والاوروبي في الصراعات الداخلية للدول من أجل جني المكاسب (السياسية والاقتصادية) وغيرها، هي التي تدفع الناس إلى مغادرة بلدانهم وكثرة الحروب النزاعات.
3. التدخل الأمريكي والاوروبي في الصراعات الدولية من أجل السيطرة وفرض نظام عالمي معين على حساب بعض الدول، هي التي تدفع الناس إلى مغادرة بلدانهم وكثرة الحروب النزاعات.
Thirdly
– The haphazard rise of unqualified individuals to lead countries is behind
many problems and wars:
The
haphazard rise of unqualified individuals to lead countries is behind many
problems and wars. Therefore, it is best that the head of state or monarch be
subject to conditions agreed upon by the people and specific to them before
assuming power, in order to work towards the following:
1.
Resolving disputes through diplomatic means before resorting to war.
2.
Sustainable development and working towards the supreme interests of the
nation.
3.
Promoting education, justice, economic development, and cooperation among
nations.
The
moderate ruler:
1.
Knows that oppressing people is the true beginning of the ruin of civilization
and the nation.
2.
Knows that he and his family need to truly enjoy life without restrictions or
guards.
3.
Knows that authority is part of the ethics of governance and religion, and that
there is no separation between religion and authority.
4.
Knows that the saying that people can only be reformed by the sword is wrong;
rather, they are reformed by justice.
5. Knows that human life
is short, however long it may seem, and that the value and dignity of a person
are more important than the struggle for power and wealth.
6. Knows that power and
politics are a trust that he bears for a time, then others take it over, with
its good and bad aspects, and he will be held accountable for it in history
before the Day of Judgment.
Do
America, the European Union, and others realize that they are a major part of
the world's problems?
1.
American and European intervention in international conflicts, such as wars,
conflicts, poverty, and climate change, is what drives people to leave their
countries and leads to an increase in wars and conflicts.
2.
American and European intervention in internal conflicts within countries to
gain (political, economic, and other) advantages is what drives people to leave
their countries and leads to an increase in wars and conflicts.
3. American and European intervention in international conflicts to control and impose a specific world order at the expense of some countries is what drives people to leave their countries and leads to an increase in wars and conflicts.
Fourth – The Desire to Establish a More Just and Independent Peace
System:
The problem of forming a new alliance or system for genuine world
peace is very costly. This step could create many problems for both those
proposing the idea and those responding to it, for many reasons, some known and
some unknown. Peace is like a lost and vulnerable right that needs someone to
defend it.
1. Who will grant this organization
authority?
2. How will it enforce its decisions on
powerful countries if they reject them?
3. The success of the idea of
implementing genuine peace depends on the number of participating countries,
their economic and political power, and the extent of their actual commitment
to the principles they declare.
4. Many organizations begin with idealistic
goals, then face the difficult question: What if one of the powerful members
violates the rules? Will the other countries accept punishing it? And do they
have the capacity to do so?
5. A peace idea that is more likely to
succeed is not in establishing "global governance," but rather in
establishing a voluntary international coalition for peace, mediation, and
international justice, in which member states commit in advance to clear
mechanisms for arbitration and conflict resolution. 6. There is nothing to
prevent a group of countries from creating a new alliance or organization based
on pre-agreed principles, but the challenge is not writing the principles, but
implementing them when they conflict with the interests of a powerful country
within the organization itself.
Some thinkers believe that sustainable peace requires three elements combined: fair rules, acceptance of these rules by states, and a genuine enforcement mechanism that applies them to everyone without exception.
In
conclusion:
1.
Nations that exchange knowledge, trade, and common interests are less inclined
towards war.
2. When wisdom prevails,
nations prosper. The true goal of any state is not victory in conflict, but
rather providing a secure life.
3. Many people in
different countries share the same idea: that every human being, regardless of
their nationality, religion, or language, fundamentally wants to live in
safety, work, raise their children, and enjoy a life of dignity and peace.
4.
Ultimately, the problem is not a lack of peaceful ideas; the world is full of
charters and declarations. The real challenge is finding the political will
that makes adherence to principles stronger than the temptations of power and
immediate self-interest. This is what has made the issue of world peace one of
the most difficult challenges humanity has faced throughout history.
Research and preparation by Badr Al-Din Ahmed.
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق